ISO 9001 in the mid-market: more efficiency instead of tiresome bureaucracy
Ask mid-sized entrepreneurs for their first associations with the ISO 9001 standard, and the phrase “bureaucratic monster” comes up more…
Read articleQuality and Process Improvement
In many organisations, the announcement of an ISO audit creates noticeable tension. When the external auditor then actually records a “nonconformity” or a deviation, leaders and teams often react with frustration or blame. The auditor is seen as an inspector who wants to “catch the staff out”.
That attitude is a fatal error of thinking.
In modern quality management the principle is this: an audit that uncovers no potential for improvement has delivered no added value. Deviations and errors are not defeats, but the most valuable raw material for the continuous improvement process (CIP).
In this article we show how to establish a constructive error culture and turn audit findings into measurable process progress.
In an organisation with a poor error culture, employees tend to conceal mishaps or sweep them under the carpet. The consequences are devastating:
A certified management system (such as ISO 9001, 14001 or 27001) demands exactly the opposite: an institutionalised, blame-free process for dealing with errors.
When an error or an audit deviation occurs, the principle of corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) applies:
The acute problem is stopped and the damage is contained.
Example: A defective batch is quarantined, or a server access that was released by mistake is withdrawn at once.
This is where most organisations fail: they fight symptoms instead of causes. If an employee has sent the wrong document, it is not enough to tell them to “pay more attention”. Ask for the system failure with the 5-Why method:
Remove the root of the problem that you have found.
Example: Introduce an automated approval workflow in the document management system that archives old versions automatically.
Actions often fizzle out if nobody checks whether they work. Plan a targeted review after 30, 60 or 90 days: has the error occurred again since then? If it has, the action was unsuitable and the cycle starts again.
A perfect organisation without errors does not exist. Excellent organisations are distinguished by recognising errors faster, addressing them more openly and eliminating them more consistently than the competition. Continuous improvement is the engine that secures that lead.
Would you like the maturity of your processes assessed independently?
Find out more about our audits and certification standards or request a no-obligation price quotation for your organisation.